Magic 
    Mountains
    
Could it 
    be by chance? Two of the richest and most accomplished works we have seen 
    in the festival are set in the mountains, and even more coincidently in the 
    Alps, somewhere above the city of Grenoble. In Didam and Tahousse, two films 
    that can be seen as a diptych, Mahine Rouhi and Olivier Fouchard set their 
    cameras in grandiose virgin landscapes and edit their film to the rolling 
    of thunder or the shadow of a cloud passing. The intense work on the film 
    medium (colors, contrasts, negatives) reinstates nature as piercingly primeval, 
    the origin of the world so distressing for mankind (who appears from time 
    to time as a fragile silhouette wandering in the open space), reminding us 
    of Carl Brown’s films, in which the photochemical work brings us back 
    to a world of initial sensations, and of Jose Val Del Omar’s cosmogonic 
    cinema to which one could reasonably doubt there was such a beautiful lineage. 
    Although it is probably more of an accident, the similarities are striking: 
    the atmospheric fast-motion, the mysterious ode to elementary forces that 
    the images convey, the tinting that, far from “colorizing” nature, 
    brings out the hidden and the timeless in it.
    
Nicolas 
    Rey’s film Schuss! could seem to have an opposite goal, since the mountains 
    he films have been harnessed and made profitable for ski resorts and the hydroelectricity-reliant 
    aluminum industry. The film is organized in chapters repeating the same structure 
    made from heterogeneous elements (portraits of skiers filmed with an old color 
    system rebuilt by the filmmaker and giving the shots a ghostly aura; rolling 
    facsimiles of reports of the board of directors of an electrometallurgy company; 
    comments by the filmmaker about the links between industry and war; old amateur 
    films on 9.5mm showing in particular skiing in an early resort, etc.) forming 
    a work of historical research whose materialist principle — to produce 
    a meaningful constellation through editing — recalls Walter Benjamin’s 
    work on 19th century Paris. Starting from a comparative postulate (cinema, 
    aluminum and ski industries were born around the same time and have witnessed 
    parallel growth to the rhythm of war efforts in the first half of the past 
    century), the filmmaker undertakes an archeology of the historical strata 
    of that “mountain” seen as a symptom of the century, confronting 
    the telltale signs of its industrial past with its timeless present of silhouettes 
    sliding down the white hills, almost disappearing into the film material. 
    And maybe the most striking image is a shot of skiers appearing out of the 
    grainy, timeless mist of what is probably the arrival of a cable car, surprisingly 
    resembling a milestone in the history of cinema: workers leaving a factory. 
    Suddenly, their apparently innocent activity represents catastrophe: man harnessing 
    nature through his industry, only to accelerate his own end, forever going 
    schuss!
    
From the 
    virgin mountains to overexploited mountains, the same tragic morality pertains 
    (a fact that could make these films close to some of Straub’s, albeit 
    their formal choices): mountains stand alone, as do men, and their solitudes 
    seem forever non-reconciled.
    
Emeric de 
    Lastens
    Festival des cinémas différents de Paris, december 2005.
